Tuesday, April 13, 2010

This blog has moved


This blog is now located at http://suburban-hum.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://suburban-hum.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Protesters cry foul over election hires

Protesters cry foul over election hires

By Craig Gustafson
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

May 23, 2007

It doesn't take much to rile up opponents of electronic voting.

So when San Diego County decided to hire two new elections officials who critics say have questionable backgrounds the ensuing conflict was inevitable.


Advertisement
About 35 protesters lashed out at county officials yesterday inside and outside of a Board of Supervisors meeting for their decision to hire Deborah Seiler and Michael Vu as the county's top two elections officials.

Seiler, who will take over as registrar of voters June 4, spent 15 years working for two electronic voting-machine companies – Diebold Election Systems and Sequoia Pacific Systems – before leading elections in Solano County. The county uses Diebold machines.

Vu, who was hired as assistant registrar last month, is regularly criticized by voting-rights advocates for his role as elections chief in Ohio's Cuyahoga County. His tenure there was marred when two of his employees received felony convictions for rigging the 2004 presidential recount to avoid a thorough review of ballots. Vu has staunchly defended the employees.

“San Diego has become the laughingstock of the country for election integrity,” said attorney Ken Simpkins, co-founder of Psephos, a nonprofit organization that monitors elections.

“It cannot be an accident that the most controversial elections officials in the country . . . are here in San Diego,” he told supervisors. “An agenda to deprive citizens of clean elections appears to be in place and the people most likely to benefit from such an agenda are incumbents who set the policy for our elections.”

Chief Administrative Officer Walt Ekard adamantly defended his decision to hire Seiler and Vu, saying they served honorably in their previous jobs and will ensure the integrity of elections here.

“I understand there are those of you who disagree with my hires,” Ekard said. “I have heard you. I have listened to you. I disagree with you and that's it.”

Several protesters yelled over Ekard's comments and board Chairman Ron Roberts ejected two of the loudest from the meeting. As one woman was leaving, she shouted, “Everything you're doing is wrong and you're subverting democracy, and we won't have it!”

Supervisor Pam Slater-Price called protesters' behavior “rude and totally unacceptable.” She said those concerned about electronic voting can cast absentee ballots, as she does each election.

Protesters took their message outside of the County Administration Center in downtown San Diego. They held signs that read “Seiler + Vu = Sleaze x 2” and “From taxpayer to Diebold” with pictures of dollars bills being exchanged.

Protesters called on county officials to halt the purchase of any more electronic voting machines until California Secretary of State Debra Bowen finishes a review of the systems in use. Bowen announced the review two weeks ago.

Psephos also plans to look at the possibility of launching an initiative that would make the registrar an elected position.

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Welcome To The New Police State

Welcome To The New Police State
By Dick Allgire
5-18-7

http://www.rense.com/general76/amdd.htm

In the old days in The United States of America, a journalist didn't have to get permission to conduct an interview in a public place. But this is a new America, a place where armed security agents watch your every move and require their permission to exercise what used to be a first amendment right.

I've been a television news reporter for 33 years. I first began covering news when Richard Nixon was about to resign. I've gone to airports many times to film-yes we used to use film- and lately to video-tape and interview famous and infamous people getting on and getting off airplanes. I've been around a while and I've covered a lot of stories at airports. Things have changed.

I want to tell you what happened to me today (May 17, 2007) at Honolulu International Airport. I was assigned to meet and interview Nainoa Thompson, navigator of the Polynesian Voyaging Canoe Hokule'a. He and his crew were departing for Japan to sail their Hawaiian canoe on the final leg of an historic voyage. It was arranged for our crew to meet them on the sidewalk outside the check-in area. All I needed was a quick couple of sound bites with Nainoa and two of the young crew members who were leaving to fulfill a cultural mission of goodwill and Aloha.

I arrived with a news photographer at the Honolulu Airport and we paid to park in the parking garage. We walked to the public sidewalk in front of the check-in area where we met Nainoa and the young crewmembers. We turned on the camera and began talking with them.

This is something I have done at least a hundred times over the past 33 years. In the USA a reporter used to be able to go to any public place and interview someone without being rousted by authorities.

This was not a restricted area. We did not attempt to board an airplane, or walk past the security gate, or get out on to a runway. We were not taping near any TSA checkpoint. We were out on the sidewalk at a public facility.

While I was interviewing an 18-year old Hawaiian, asking how he felt about taking a voyage on a Hawaiian canoe several uniformed security agents walked up and stopped the interview. They insisted that we cease videotaping. They demanded to know what we were doing, who authorized us to be there, and whether we had permission.

EXCUSE ME???

In the United States of America that I grew up in a reporter was allowed to interview anyone in any public place, about anything, at any time, without requesting or having to be granted permission by unformed goons. Pardon me- I mean low wage security guards.

I snapped, and perhaps I should apologize to these poor rent-a-cops. I did not say it to their faces, but as I turned to go to the airport security office I did mutter an obscenity: "This is the f&#^ing United States. You don't need permission to do an interview in a public place. This is not supposed to be a goddamned fascist state!"

They heard me. Now I was asking for trouble. They called for backups. Several more armed security guards surrounded my cameraman. He told them, "It's not big deal; we're just trying to interview some people about sailing on the Hokule'a."

I went to the security office and got "permission" from airport authorities to do something that is supposed to be guaranteed under our (former) Constitution.

It saddens me to see America slipping into a state that allows armed security guards to demand "authorization" for something that used to be taken for granted. I never before had to get "permission" from "authorities" to talk to someone in a public place. I brought this up in the security office when they were so graciously "granting" me permission to resume my interview. A security guard in front of a bank of television surveillance monitors told me, "Things are different after 911."

I wonder- what does a well known television reporter interviewing young Hawaiian kids in a public place about sailing on a canoe have to do with 911? How is this a threat?

And the saddest thing for me is this- young people growing up today will simply submit. They won't even remember a time when a reporter- or any citizen- could go to an airport and talk to someone without having to get permission from authorities.



Dick Allgire

KITV News, Honolulu

Friday, May 11, 2007

And what would "Pro-Semitism" look like, pray tell..?

That question shut up one of my little Zionist squabble-mates in another forum -- what does "pro-Semitism" look like? Would it be a disproportionately high number of Jews in Congress? Would it be the unquestioning, eternal support, nay, fealty and the forging of foreign policy to please... Semites?

Really, what would "pro-Semitism" be?

The right hates Jews because we killed their messiah; the left hates Jews because we don't lay down and let ourselves be butchered by Arab haters. So what are we to do?

Play the victim card again. It works every time. You've got your "shitty little country" now. Take your claws out of my nation's government and get by on your own. You have more than enough money and do not need nor deserve 20% of the US foreign aid budget.

As if it's a sin to notice such things. "The old adage has it that, when visiting a foreign country, to ascertain who really runs things, one need determine only who is spoken about in whispers, if at all."

A Jewish President? No, I don't think so. Is that "anti-Semitic"? No, it's pro-American. Fuck off and die.